Calafiori vs. Rogers

Final Verdict: Rogers

Rogers edges it due to his higher attacking ceiling as a midfielder and a kinder upcoming fixture, with both players fully available.

Head-to-Head Analysis

Availability & Risk: Both Calafiori and Rogers are fully fit and available for selection, with no injury news or doubts.
Form: Calafiori has a slightly higher form (9.0 vs 8.0) and points per game (9.0 vs 8.0) from GW1, thanks to an assist and a clean sheet. Rogers also started strong with a goal.
Fixtures: Rogers has a more favourable GW2 fixture at home against Brighton (difficulty 2), while Calafiori faces a tougher away trip to Aston Villa (difficulty 4). Rogers' overall next three fixtures also look slightly kinder.
Value: Calafiori offers better points-per-million (1.61 vs 1.07) and is significantly cheaper at 5.6m compared to Rogers' 7.5m.
Underlying Stats: Rogers, as a midfielder, boasts superior ICT Index (13.1 vs 4.2), Influence, Creativity, and Threat. His expected goal involvement (1.06) in GW1 was excellent, indicating strong attacking potential. Calafiori's underlying attacking stats are much lower, as expected for a defender.

The Deciding Factor

Rogers' role as an attacking midfielder, demonstrated by his GW1 goal and strong underlying attacking metrics, combined with a favourable home fixture in Gameweek 2, makes him the better pick for immediate points potential.

My Team Analysis

Gameweek Analysis

Player Analysis

Players Comparison

Team Analysis